JANE LUBCHENCO
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Projects and Leadership
    • Bio and Quotes
    • Curriculum Vitae
    • Awards and honors
  • What's New
  • Students
  • Science & Society
    • Science Communication
    • Roles and Responsibilities
    • Science to Policy
  • Govt Service
    • NOAA
    • Science Envoy
    • White House - OSTP
  • Contact

White House - ​Office of Science and Technology Policy


Dr. Lubchenco served as the Deputy Director for Climate and Environment in the White House (WH) Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) from February 16, 2021 to January 10, 2025. She assembled a stellar Climate and Environment (C&E) Team of around 60 exceptional scientists and policy experts who served terms of varying length, with around 25 people in place at any one time.  The Team was equally split between detailees from federal agencies and appointees or fellows from academia and civil society, plus some amazing interns.
Picture
The C&E Team focused on science for policy (creating new or updating existing policies) and policy for science (such as Scientific Integrity).  Working closely with colleagues across the WH and federal agencies, they sought to integrate science-based solutions to climate, inequity and inequality, loss of biodiversity and nature, and environmental health – with a special focus on the ocean and polar regions.  They worked to create “sticky” policies that would persist. Below are a few achievements that the Team led or strongly influenced.  ​

Achievements

Climate Change. The C&E Team successfully broadened the Administration’s historically ambitious climate change actions which were initially focused primarily on emissions reductions, clean energy, and environmental justice to also include adaptation and resilience, carbon removal, ocean-based climate solutions, nature-based solutions, and provision of climate services (data, information, products) to enable smart climate choices. The C&E Team provided the voice of science in developing the Administration’s climate policies – proposing new initiatives and vetting those suggested by others.  And they elevated the voices of scientists across the administration and the world, for example, through support of the IPCC and delivering the Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5).
  • Recognizing the importance of natural solutions to climate change, the Team led creation of a widely praised Roadmap for Nature-based Solutions and a Resource Guide to enable its success, then later expanded the efforts and tracked progress in implementing it. 
  • The Team co-led efforts to develop a comprehensive strategy to Measure, Monitor, Report, and Verify Greenhouse Gases. 
  • They co-led efforts to promote adaptation and resilience.
  • And guided development of new tools to help plan for and protect against floods with both FEMA and HUD.   
  • They helped elevate the connections between climate change and migration, and devoted resources to addressing related challenges.
 
  • C&E Team members led the U.S. Global Change Research Program, expanding its 13-member agencies for the first time in over two decades to 15 (adding the Department of Homeland Security/FEMA, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, growing its budget, and expanding its mission through a new strategic plan to include global changes, not just climate change, and coordination of climate services not just of research.
  • They led the production and delivery of the Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), including the pioneering NCA Atlas, a Climate x Art juried competition, translation into Spanish, podcasts, and an audiobook. 
  • And since changes in biodiversity are a global change, they oversaw the creation of a new assessment of the status of nature and nature’s benefits in the U.S. (see below, under Nature).
  • The Team worked with colleagues in other WH offices and NOAA and other agencies to streamline access to climate services = useful information about climate changes. 
 
  • Recognizing the importance of removing carbon from the atmosphere, the Team spearheaded identification of research priorities for marine carbon-dioxide removal (mCDR).
  • And understanding the untapped potential of the ocean to provide climate solutions, they led the nation’s first federal Ocean Climate Action Plan and its implementation.
Significant resources were allocated to implementing most of the above policies through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act.  Although these ambitious, integrated, and comprehensive efforts dramatically increased the nation’s progress in tackling climate change, they were understood to be only a down payment on what is needed.

​
Nature. The C&E Team appreciated that loss of biodiversity and nature is a national and global threat on par with climate change. Elsewhere in the Administration, the nature agenda focused on conserving 30% of U.S. lands and waters by 2030 through the America the Beautiful Initiative.  The C&E Team took a broader, 100% approach, understanding that halting and reversing the loss of biodiversity would require much more than creating protected and conserved areas.  The Team focused on addressing the underlying drivers of loss of biodiversity and nature by connecting the dots between nature and nature’s benefits to the economy, health, national security, climate solutions and environmental justice. They called this integrated, strategic approach ‘Mainstreaming Nature’ and published a scientific paper summarizing the approach and key elements (see the Supplemental Materials in the paper). Below are a few of the results.
  • The C&E Team pioneered ambitious actions to create integrated solutions, such as Nature-based Solutions, mCDR, adaptation and resilience strategies and other efforts noted above in the Climate section. 
  • In addition, the Team led the nation’s first effort to put nature on the economic balance sheet of the country, through creation and implementation of Natural Capital Accounts, partnerships with other nations doing NCA, and international efforts to develop marine accounts.  
  • They led the US effort to help create the G7 Alliance for Nature-Positive Economies.
  • And they hosted events such as the Invest In Nature Summit to elevate the central role of nature across the economy, human health, and climate solutions.
 
  • Working closely with colleagues in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and seeking both to align policy with current economic and scientific knowledge and to promote good governance, Team members helped update two key policies (OMB Circular A-4 and Circular A-94) to require federal agencies to include ecosystem services in their Benefit-Cost Analyses (BCA), including providing instructions on how to calculate the economic value of ecosystem services. 
  • Updating Circulars A-4 and A-94 also included modifications to discount rates and distributional analyses. 
  • And because more new advances in BCA are needed to improve federal decision-making, OSTP, OMB and the Council of Economic Advisors created a new interagency mechanism to highlight areas where advances are needed, engage with outside academic and other experts, and ensure rapid uptake of new advances by the federal government.
  • The Team led the establishment of the first-ever assessment of the state of nature and nature’s benefits in the U.S., called the National Nature Assessment. (Although the next Administration cancelled this effort, it has been resurrected, expanded, and modified as an independent effort called The Nature Record, with a report expected in Q4 of 2026.)
PictureUnder Secretary of State Jose Fernandez signed the High Seas Treaty for the U.S., with witnesses Elizabeth Kim, J.R. Littlejohn and Jane Lubchenco, at the United Nations, September 20, 2023
  • Understanding the importance of nature to national security, the Team promoted the concept of natural security and successfully included biodiversity and climate change in the National Security Strategy for the first time.  
  • The C&E Team worked closely with colleagues in the State Department and the WH to successfully conclude negotiations for the UN Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdictions (BBNJ) (known colloquially as the High Seas Treaty), ensure the U.S. signed it on the first day the Agreement was open for signature, and transmit the ratification papers to the Senate for its Advice and Consent.  

  • The Team assisted with establishment of the first Indigenous-led National Marine Sancturary, the Chumash Heritage National Marine Sanctuary. 
  • It promoted creation of new sanctuary in the Pacific Remote Islands, to expand and strengthen protections of the existing Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (MNM) and launch a consultative process to rename the area the Pacific Islands Heritage NMN. 
 
Indigenous Engagement and Knowledge. The C&E Team included Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and a Native Hawaiian.  Their knowledge and lived experiences greatly enriched the Team’s work across all areas.  Formal Tribal Consultation, engagement with Indigenous individuals, communities and organizations, and partnership with the WH Council on Native American Affairs characterized the Team’s approach to formulating relevant policies.  In addition,
  • C&E Team members proposed and led the development of a new administration-wide policy and implementation guidelines to recognize and elevate the importance of Indigenous Knowledge across federal actions, and the creation of an interagency mechanism to help agencies understand and advance successful application of the policy.     
  • In addition to renaming the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument (see above under Nature), with the C&E Team’s assistance, the President also recognized posthumously the sacrifice of young Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander men, called collectively the Hui Panalāʻau, who were sent to secure the U.S. territorial claim to islands in the run up to World War II. 
 
Ocean. The C&E Team elevated the importance of the ocean across most of its work and promoted ocean science and exploration.  This included the above-mentioned climate efforts (Ocean Climate Action Plan, Marine Carbon-Dioxide Removal Research Strategy, coastal restoration for climate resilience); nature policies (Natural Capital Accounts marine accounts; Global Ocean Accounts Partnership; new National Marine Sanctuaries; High Seas Treaty); and new Indigenous engagement to rename a marine national monument).  In addition,
  • At the direction of Congress, C&E and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) established and led a new interagency coordinating mechanism, the Ocean Policy Committee, including developing its scope and action plans. 
  • The C&E Team spearheaded the U. S. joining the High-Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy in 2021.  Lubchenco served as President Biden’s “Sherpa” (special ocean envoy) to the Ocean Panel, leading U.S. efforts to create a National Strategy for a Sustainable Ocean Economy, and encouraging other nations to create their own Ocean Climate Action Plans, join the Green Shipping Challenge and enhance its ambitions, and ratify key international agreements or treaties such as the Port States Measures Agreement, WTO’s Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, and the High Seas Treaty.
 
  • The Team worked closely with WH offices, the State Department, NOAA, and other interagency colleagues to address Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported (IUU) Fishing and associated Human Labor Abuses, including crafting National Security Memorandum 11 and working to ensure its effective implementation.
 
  • C&E Team worked closely with colleagues in NOAA, Department of Interior, the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History and other agencies to deliver a National Aquatic eDNA Strategy, produce a National Ocean Biodiversity Strategy, and support important Management Plans for both the Mariana Trench Marine National Monument and the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument.
 
  • C&E worked closely with CEQ and the interagency to deliver the nation’s first Ocean Justice Strategy.  They highlighted the importance of ocean partnerships; argued for the importance of ocean exploration and discovery; and identified strategic priorities for ocean exploration and characterization.
  • The C&E Team championed ocean science and stewardship in a range of international fora, including the UN Ocean Conference.
 
Polar. The C&E Team coordinated Executive branch science and policy efforts for both Arctic and Antarctic regions, seeking to enable and strengthen scientific advances and effective, integrated science-based policies at both poles. 
  • The C&E team worked closely with the Office of Presidential Personnel to help ensure that strong candidates were considered for the Presidentially appointed U.S. Arctic Research Commission.
 
  • The Executive Director of the Interagency Arctic Research and Policy Committee (IARPC) was a member of the C&E Team. IARPC delivered historically ambitious, integrated, and responsive research, science, and Indigenous Knowledge advances, through its Arctic Research Plan and Implementation Plans, as documented in Reports to Congress.  
  • IARPC also made a strong case to Congress for a Sustained Arctic Observing Network.  
 
  • C&E Team members served as the Director and the Deputy Director of the reactivated interagency Arctic Executive Steering Committee (AESC). Working closely with the National Security Council (NSC) team, the C&E team identified high-priority needs for integrated efforts across agencies and coordinated delivery of results.
  • The AESC Deputy Director and Director also oversaw the establishment and operation of the interagency Task Force on the Northern Bering Sea Climate Resilience Area and facilitated its communications with the companion Bering Intergovernmental Tribal Advisory Council.
  • The AESC developed a Charter for the Bering Task Force and a Charter for the Arctic Resilience Working Group.
  • And with the Tribal Advisory Council, produced a Joint Vision Statement regarding the status of salmon in the Northern Bering Sea and Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta system.
  • AESC leadership assisted the NSC in developing the National Strategy for the Arctic Region (NSAR) (see Fact Sheet). The AESC led development of the Implementation Plan for the NSAR, then led tracking and delivery of the commitments therein.
  • C&E Members led development of the first update of the National Security Memorandum on U. S. Policy in the Antarctic Region in 30 years, to reaffirm the overarching goals of peaceful pursuit of science and international collaboration, and strong commitment to conservation in the region and to acknowledge and respond to impacts of climate change and changing geopolitics.
 
Environmental Health. The C&E team focused on the five major topics below, coordinating multiple interagency subject matter expert committees to evaluate the state of the science, research priorities, and actions needed to address each topic.  C&E Team members initiated actions on the first two topics. The last three responded to directives from Congress in the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2021 which mandated the creation of new interagency coordinating mechanisms to address Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Contaminants of Emerging Concern, and Sustainable Chemistry.  The C&E Team constituted three new interagency working groups through the National Science and Technology Council.  Highlights of the work of these five teams includes:
  • Toxic exposure: C&E led a team of scientists who proposed to the Veterans Administration leadership a vastly improved way of determining toxic exposure for veterans, taking advantage of big data and state-of-the-science analytical tools.  This updated scientific protocol was embraced by the VA leadership and incorporated into the bipartisan Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act and is now enabling delivery of timely benefits and services to veterans impacted by toxic exposures while serving our country.  As required by the legislation, a new C&E-led interagency group later produced a 5-yr strategic plan to prioritize toxic exposure research across agencies to accelerate more advances in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. 
  • Indoor Air Quality: In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic when most of the public was focused on vaccines, C&E drew attention to scientific information about the importance of indoor air quality and the steps that could be taken to improve it.
 
  • Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): C&E led a comprehensive interagency effort to summarize the state of knowledge about PFAS, then produced a summary and a new research strategy to advance knowledge to protect communities from effects of PFAS.
  • Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Understanding the importance of safe drinking water and increasing concerns about emerging contaminants in air, water and soil, C&E led production of Research Priorities and an Implementation Plan to better coordinate and accelerate efforts to identify, detect, understand, and address emerging contaminants.
  • Sustainable Chemistry: C&E led an interagency team to summarize what is known and what needs to be done to pursue ‘sustainable chemistry’.
Scientific Integrity. Science, evidence, and data are the foundation of effective policies that improve the health, security, safety, equity, and well-being of people. Moreover, for the public to trust federal policies and information, it is imperative that governmental personnel not manipulate, suppress, distort, or cherry-pick scientific information for political purposes.  Scientific Integrity policies are designed to do just that: ensure that federal information and policies adhere to the highest standards and be based on the best current scientific understanding.
After evidence surfaced in 2003 about WH political appointees in the Bush Administration manipulating and suppressing climate change scientific information, it became clear that the federal government needed clear SI policies. President Obama’s Memorandum initiated action and his Science Advisor, John Holdren articulated six SI guiding principles, followed by instructions to agencies to develop agency SI policies. NOAA’s 2011 SI Policy (amplified by its Procedural Handbook), developed under Lubchenco’s leadership, was lauded as the ‘gold standard’ of SI policies. That policy was tested in 2019 with the ‘Sharpiegate’ incident and enabled NOAA scientists to stand up to the President who had ordered one of his political appointees to alter a scientifically based forecast of the path of Hurricane Dorian.  That and other experiences revealed the need to further strengthen SI policies.  In 2018, Congress passed the Evidence Act, requiring that scientific knowledge, data, and evidence be the foundation for federal agency action. 
  • In 2021, President Biden signaled his administration’s strong commitment to evidence, science, and scientific integrity through a Memorandum on Restoring Trust in Government through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking.
  • As directed, OSTP (C&E and the Science and Society team) stood up a SI Task Force to review and evaluate existing policies and seek broad input to develop guidelines for agencies. 
  • The co-chairs of the SI Task Force summarized this work in an editorial in Science.  In that article, Alondra Nelson and Lubchenco reiterated the Obama Administration’s 6 SI Principles and added 5 Biden Administration OSTP principles: the ability of scientists to freely dissent must be protected; SI policies apply to all agencies, not just scientific agencies; SI policies apply to all federal personnel, including political appointees and non-scientists; scientists should actively participate in policy-formulation; and agency scientists should be free to discuss their non-classified research and findings with those outside the government, including journalists.  Finally, the article emphasizes that violations of scientific integrity policies be considered comparable to violations of government ethics rules.  
  • Based upon the TF’s report and these principles, the TF developed an SI framework for agencies to use to strengthen or develop their SI policies. Nineteen agencies proceeded to create new or enhance existing SI policies and implement them.
 
Environmental Justice. Environmental Justice was woven throughout the above policies and activities, for example the Justice40 Initiative (Climate), the Ocean Justice Strategy (Ocean), Indigenous Knowledge policies (IK), recognition of the Hui Panalā‘au (Ocean), and more. In addition, recognizing the need for vastly improved EJ science, data and research, a new research strategy was crafted.
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Projects and Leadership
    • Bio and Quotes
    • Curriculum Vitae
    • Awards and honors
  • What's New
  • Students
  • Science & Society
    • Science Communication
    • Roles and Responsibilities
    • Science to Policy
  • Govt Service
    • NOAA
    • Science Envoy
    • White House - OSTP
  • Contact